$300/hrAs published by the platform.
This remote, part-time role asks breast imaging radiologists to read de-identified studies and write reference findings that will set the standard for testing AI systems. Contributors also review AI-drafted reports and flag content that is inaccurate, unsupported or unsafe. It is intended for fellowship-trained specialists with substantial independent practice.
$300/hr
Pay as published by the platform. It is not a guarantee of income or hours.
Open to residents of: United States.
You apply on work.mercor.com: create a profile, complete a skills assessment, then get matched to projects that fit your background.
Official posting: https://work.mercor.com/jobs/list_AAABoYCbMc_LN-3AeS5F25b5/breast-imaging-radiologist
Last checked on October 29, 2026.
This role asks radiologists and imaging technologists to read de-identified scans and judge how accurately frontier AI models interpret them. Contributors write structured reports and impressions, then compare them with model output to find errors and gaps. It suits clinicians with hands-on imaging experience who can explain why a machine-generated report is wrong.
This remote, part-time role asks practicing orthodontists to read de-identified dental radiographs and CBCT studies and record reference findings that will be used to test AI imaging tools. Candidates should be experienced orthodontists who can also judge whether AI-drafted reads are inaccurate, unsupported, or unsafe.
Posted October 28, 2026
This remote role asks clinicians to read de-identified medical scans and accompanying case histories to help build reference standards for diagnostic AI benchmarks. Reviewers apply structured scoring rubrics and submit written evaluations asynchronously through a secure platform. It is aimed at practicing radiologists, imaging specialists, attending physicians, and fellows who interpret diagnostic images in daily practice.
Posted October 22, 2026
This remote, hourly contract asks you to review and grade AI-generated content about healthcare data, electronic health record systems, and clinical workflows. The work helps AI labs make their models more accurate on medical information. It suits health informatics professionals who can judge clinical and technical accuracy and explain their feedback in writing.
This remote contract role asks medical science professionals to review and validate AI-generated biomedical content for accuracy, clarity, and context. It suits people with a background in medical affairs, clinical research, or scientific communication who want to shape how AI handles medical information.
This project asks pharmacy technicians to check medication-related clinical content and judge AI-generated answers for accuracy, safety, clarity and completeness, supporting AI-powered prior authorisation workflows. It is aimed at technicians with solid medication management and pharmacy operations experience who want to work on healthcare AI.
Posted October 27, 2026
