$350/hrAs published by the platform.
This remote, part-time role asks a practicing orthopedic surgeon to review how AI models answer clinical questions in orthopedic surgery. The reviewer checks each answer against de-identified patient charts and judges which response is clinically stronger.
$350/hr
Pay as published by the platform. It is not a guarantee of income or hours.
Open to residents of: United States.
You apply on work.mercor.com: create a profile, complete a skills assessment, then get matched to projects that fit your background.
Official posting: https://work.mercor.com/jobs/list_AAABoWtwmMBbLnGYAPFKNLAQ/orthopedic-surgeon
Last checked on October 27, 2026.
This remote, hourly contract asks you to review and grade AI-generated content about healthcare data, electronic health record systems, and clinical workflows. The work helps AI labs make their models more accurate on medical information. It suits health informatics professionals who can judge clinical and technical accuracy and explain their feedback in writing.
This remote contract role asks medical science professionals to review and validate AI-generated biomedical content for accuracy, clarity, and context. It suits people with a background in medical affairs, clinical research, or scientific communication who want to shape how AI handles medical information.
This role asks radiologists and imaging technologists to read de-identified scans and judge how accurately frontier AI models interpret them. Contributors write structured reports and impressions, then compare them with model output to find errors and gaps. It suits clinicians with hands-on imaging experience who can explain why a machine-generated report is wrong.
This remote, hourly part-time role asks board-certified critical care physicians to assess AI answers to critical care clinical questions. Reviewers compare the answers against de-identified patient charts for accuracy, safety and adherence to current standards of care. It suits practicing intensivists who want to shape how clinicians and patients will use health AI models.
Posted October 24, 2026
This role asks practicing dermatologists to review answers that health AI models give to dermatology questions. Reviewers check each answer against a de-identified patient chart for clinical accuracy and safety, then judge which of two responses is stronger. It suits board-certified dermatologists who want to shape how clinicians and patients will rely on these tools.
Posted October 24, 2026
This remote, asynchronous study asks practicing pharmacists to review de-identified clinical cases and pharmaceutical product images, then write expert evaluations and help build scoring rubrics. The results are meant to benchmark medical AI tools that interpret drug data and patient cases. It suits pharmacists from retail, clinical, or specialized hospital settings who can explain clinical reasoning clearly.
Posted October 23, 2026
