$150/hrAs published by the platform.
This remote, part-time role asks practicing otolaryngologists to review how well AI models answer clinical questions in ENT. Reviewers compare answers against de-identified patient charts and judge accuracy, safety, and adherence to current standards of care. It suits physicians with board certification and recent independent practice who can give clear written feedback.
$150/hr
Pay as published by the platform. It is not a guarantee of income or hours.
Open to residents of: United States.
You apply on work.mercor.com: create a profile, complete a skills assessment, then get matched to projects that fit your background.
Official posting: https://work.mercor.com/jobs/list_AAABoWtv9pI6MJtsV35ELp_E/otolaryngologist-ent
Last checked on October 27, 2026.
This remote, hourly contract asks you to review and grade AI-generated content about healthcare data, electronic health record systems, and clinical workflows. The work helps AI labs make their models more accurate on medical information. It suits health informatics professionals who can judge clinical and technical accuracy and explain their feedback in writing.
This remote contract role asks public health graduates to bring their domain knowledge to AI training. The work involves building realistic population health scenarios, writing evidence-based reference answers, and reviewing AI-generated health advice for accuracy, logic, bias, and ethics. It suits independent, self-directed specialists who can explain health data clearly, and no prior AI experience is required.
This role involves evaluating how well AI models reason through cardiology cases, identifying errors in clinical judgment that could harm patients. Cardiologists will write prompts to test AI reasoning, review AI outputs for accuracy against current guidelines, and provide correct answers when the model errs, serving as the training signal for AI improvement.
This role involves evaluating AI-generated responses to health and medical questions for clinical accuracy and safety. The expert identifies errors in reasoning, missed contraindications, unsafe advice, and writes correct answers grounded in current clinical practice, ensuring AI models provide guidance that real clinicians would trust.
This remote, hourly part-time role asks board-certified critical care physicians to assess AI answers to critical care clinical questions. Reviewers compare the answers against de-identified patient charts for accuracy, safety and adherence to current standards of care. It suits practicing intensivists who want to shape how clinicians and patients will use health AI models.
Posted October 24, 2026
This role asks practicing dermatologists to review answers that health AI models give to dermatology questions. Reviewers check each answer against a de-identified patient chart for clinical accuracy and safety, then judge which of two responses is stronger. It suits board-certified dermatologists who want to shape how clinicians and patients will rely on these tools.
Posted October 24, 2026
