$350/hrAs published by the platform.
This remote, part-time role asks board-certified radiologists to review how AI models answer radiology questions. Experts compare each answer against de-identified patient charts to judge accuracy, safety and adherence to current standards of care. It suits physicians with radiology board certification and at least one year of independent practice after training.
$350/hr
Pay as published by the platform. It is not a guarantee of income or hours.
Open to residents of: United States.
You apply on work.mercor.com: create a profile, complete a skills assessment, then get matched to projects that fit your background.
Official posting: https://work.mercor.com/jobs/list_AAABoWtwzY78zzncm-FELrjZ/radiologist
Last checked on October 27, 2026.
This role asks radiologists and imaging technologists to read de-identified scans and judge how accurately frontier AI models interpret them. Contributors write structured reports and impressions, then compare them with model output to find errors and gaps. It suits clinicians with hands-on imaging experience who can explain why a machine-generated report is wrong.
This role asks practicing dermatologists to review answers that health AI models give to dermatology questions. Reviewers check each answer against a de-identified patient chart for clinical accuracy and safety, then judge which of two responses is stronger. It suits board-certified dermatologists who want to shape how clinicians and patients will rely on these tools.
Posted October 24, 2026
This role asks board-certified endocrinologists to assess how accurately AI systems answer clinical questions in endocrinology. Reviewers compare each answer against a de-identified patient chart and current standards of care, then judge which of two responses is stronger. It suits practicing physicians who want flexible, part-time remote work.
Posted October 24, 2026
This remote study asks radiology trainees to read de-identified medical images and clinical cases and record structured diagnostic assessments on their desktop. Their reads will serve as reference evaluations for building and checking benchmarks for diagnostic evaluation tools. It is aimed at current radiology residents with hands-on imaging experience, across training years and sub-specialty tracks.
Posted October 23, 2026
This remote role asks clinicians to read de-identified medical scans and accompanying case histories to help build reference standards for diagnostic AI benchmarks. Reviewers apply structured scoring rubrics and submit written evaluations asynchronously through a secure platform. It is aimed at practicing radiologists, imaging specialists, attending physicians, and fellows who interpret diagnostic images in daily practice.
Posted October 22, 2026
This project-based role involves reviewing pre-generated health scenarios used to train AI health assistants. Reviewers rate how realistic each scenario is and how much safety risk it carries, then strengthen weak or missing constraints. It is aimed at generalist doctors and experienced nurses with strong patient-facing experience who can tell authentic care-seeking situations from generic ones.
Posted February 5, 2026
