$180/hrAs published by the platform.
This project asks US patent attorneys to judge the quality of AI-generated patent work for an AI lab that trains frontier models on legal reasoning data. The work is aimed at lawyers who practice patent prosecution or patent litigation and who can spot legal, technical, factual and citation errors.
$180/hr
Pay as published by the platform. It is not a guarantee of income or hours.
Open to residents of: United States.
You apply on work.mercor.com: create a profile, complete a skills assessment, then get matched to projects that fit your background.
Official posting: https://work.mercor.com/jobs/list_AAABoZQFI1_FwyFlEzJGgZW-/us-patent-attorney-prosecution-litigation
Last checked on November 3, 2026.
This project asks US-licensed litigators to train an AI model on legal reasoning by comparing pairs of federal motion briefs written for the same case. Reviewers pick the stronger brief, score both on defined quality criteria, and mark legal, factual, citation and drafting errors directly in the PDFs. It suits attorneys with federal court experience who have drafted or opposed motions.
Posted October 23, 2026
This remote contract role asks experienced litigators admitted to practice to judge AI-generated legal work and create realistic litigation material for training legal AI models. Typical tasks include side-by-side comparisons of memos, motions and briefs, plus writing fact patterns with model answers. Candidates join an evergreen talent pool and are contacted when matching projects open.
Posted October 23, 2026
This role evaluates how AI models handle audit procedures, internal controls, and assurance judgments by testing their reasoning, identifying gaps in professional skepticism, and writing correct audit approaches. It is for experienced auditors who can assess whether AI-generated evidence actually supports audit opinions.
As an IP Attorney, you will evaluate how AI models handle patent prosecution, trademark analysis, and IP strategy work. You'll test the model's reasoning on patentability, claim construction, and prior art analysis, then write rigorous legal opinions to correct errors and train the system. This role suits experienced IP practitioners who can identify and remedy flawed AI reasoning across intellectual property domains.
This contract role asks practicing federal civil litigators to judge the quality of legal motions drafted by AI systems. The work covers ranking alternative drafts, editing them to a ready-to-file standard, and building criteria for evaluating AI-generated legal arguments. It suits attorneys with substantial federal motion practice who can explain what makes legal writing persuasive in court.
Posted October 30, 2026
Referral link to micro1's job list: search for this role there. Open this exact job
This remote contract role asks practicing lawyers to write difficult legal reasoning problems drawn from their own experience, each with a worked answer and grading criteria. Contributors also review problems written by other attorneys for legal accuracy and flag any that are ambiguous. It suits experienced litigators and other practitioners who want project-based work alongside their practice.
Posted October 29, 2026
Referral link to micro1's job list: search for this role there. Open this exact job
