$50-80/hrAs published by the platform.
This contract role asks legal professionals to review Bluebook and pincite grading rubrics and to design sample cite-checking exercises for an AI legal citation project. It suits law students and recent law graduates who have cite-checked for a law review or journal and can explain why a citation is wrong. No prior AI experience is needed.
$50-80/hr
Pay as published by the platform. It is not a guarantee of income or hours.
Open to residents of: Bangladesh, Hong Kong SAR China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Malaysia, Pakistan, Philippines, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand, Uzbekistan, Vietnam, Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Netherlands, Portugal, Russia, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom, Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Peru, Algeria, Bahrain, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, Oman, Palestinian Territories, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates, United States, Canada, Nigeria, Kenya, South Africa, Ghana, Ethiopia.
You apply on micro1: create an account, complete a screening interview with its AI interviewer, then join its vetted expert network to be matched to projects.
Official posting: https://jobs.micro1.ai/post/f78b7cdc-5357-4f5c-b86c-92d88b5de36d
Last checked on October 21, 2026.
This remote freelance role asks you to review and assess AI-generated content on law, government policy, and regulatory compliance. You check accuracy, citations, terminology, and how well the AI handles nuance across legislation, case law, and public policy. It suits people with a background in law, government, or policy who can write clear, structured feedback and work on their own schedule.
This remote contract role asks legal and policy professionals to check AI-generated content on legislation, case law, and government matters for accuracy and nuance. The work is independent and asynchronous, and it suits people with strong legal or public policy knowledge who want to help shape how AI handles consequential outputs. No prior AI experience is needed.
This role involves evaluating and improving AI legal reasoning by grading model outputs against professional standards, identifying errors like invented citations and misapplied precedent, and writing correct legal analysis when needed. It is suited for attorneys and legal professionals who can assess AI-generated legal content and provide high-quality written corrections.
As an IP Attorney, you will evaluate how AI models handle patent prosecution, trademark analysis, and IP strategy work. You'll test the model's reasoning on patentability, claim construction, and prior art analysis, then write rigorous legal opinions to correct errors and train the system. This role suits experienced IP practitioners who can identify and remedy flawed AI reasoning across intellectual property domains.
This remote contract role is for law students and recent law graduates with journal cite-checking experience who will help build a legal citation project. The work consists of reviewing Bluebook and pincite grading rubrics and writing sample citation tasks with worked explanations. No prior AI experience is needed, since Bluebook fluency and editorial judgment are the core requirements.
Posted October 20, 2026
Referral link to micro1's job list: search for this role there. Open this exact job
This contract role asks law students and recent law graduates to review the grading rubrics used for legal citation work and to design sample cite-checking exercises. Each exercise pairs source material with citations containing realistic errors, along with the corrected version and an explanation of the governing rule. It suits people with law journal cite-checking or editing experience who can apply The Bluebook consistently, and no prior AI experience is needed.
Posted October 20, 2026
Referral link to micro1's job list: search for this role there. Open this exact job
