Open AI training and model evaluation roles that call for Vulnerability Assessment expertise, gathered from 4 platforms. Part of Data & Machine Learning.
Pay figures cover the 66 open jobs that publish an hourly rate in USD. They are published rates, not a guarantee of income. Last checked on October 8, 2026.
This role involves evaluating AI models' ability to generate secure code by identifying vulnerabilities, testing their security reasoning, and writing corrections when they fail. It suits security engineers and cybersecurity professionals who can spot weaknesses in authentication, cryptography, input handling, and secret management that automated tools miss.
This role involves evaluating how AI models reason about offensive security concepts and identifying flaws in their exploit chain reasoning. Penetration testers with hands-on red team experience will test model outputs across reconnaissance, exploitation, privilege escalation, and lateral movement, then write accurate attack paths that reflect real-world tradecraft when models fall short.
You will contribute to training AI models by applying your expertise in cybersecurity and software development. You will analyze vulnerabilities, fix bugs, implement features and perform security audits on various projects. This role is aimed at experienced engineers in information security and backend development.
Posted September 21, 2026
Referral link to micro1's job list: search for this role there. Open this exact job
You will work on evaluating frontier AI models to test their ability to distinguish legitimate chemical requests from malicious uses. As a chemical defense researcher, you will write targeted questions, evaluate model responses against a defined policy framework, and document your judgments with rigorous technical justifications. This role requires deep expertise in chemical defense to draw the line between routine professional questions and those with high potential for misuse.
Posted September 14, 2026
You will contribute to evaluating AI models as an expert in explosives and energetic materials. Your role involves writing sharp technical questions in your field, evaluating model responses against a safety policy, and documenting correct answers with technical justification. This work requires the ability to distinguish legitimate professional questions from suspicious requests that could serve malicious purposes.
Posted September 14, 2026
You will contribute to evaluating AI models for radiological safety by writing test requests at different difficulty levels and judging whether the model's responses meet safety standards. This role requires recognized expertise in radiological crisis management, capable of distinguishing legitimate professional questions from potentially dangerous requests.
Posted September 14, 2026
You will write and evaluate requests designed to test the ability of AI models to distinguish legitimate technical questions from dangerous requests in the field of energetic materials. This role requires deep expertise in post-incident analysis and regulatory inspection to draw the line between routine professional uses and potential misuse.
Posted September 14, 2026
You will contribute to the evaluation of frontier AI models as an expert in nuclear materials and non-proliferation measures. Your job is to write sophisticated test questions in your field and evaluate whether models correctly refuse dangerous requests while answering legitimate questions, drawing a subtle line between civil and military applications.
Posted September 14, 2026
This role involves assessing the ability of AI models to correctly judge the potential for misuse of technical requests concerning energetic materials and propulsion. As a specialist, you will write progressively complex questions, evaluate model responses against a defined policy, and document your analyses to guide the behavior of AI systems when facing real-world risks.
Posted September 14, 2026
You will help test the robustness of AI models against malicious risks as a radiation protection specialist. Your role consists of designing deliberately ambiguous technical requests, evaluating the model's responses according to a defined security policy, and documenting best practices, while knowing how to distinguish legitimate professional questions from malicious intentions.
Posted September 14, 2026
You will evaluate how AI models handle sensitive requests in industrial hygiene and process safety, distinguishing legitimate professional questions from malicious bypass attempts. You will write graduated test requests, assess model responses against a defined policy standard, and document your judgments with technical reasoning accessible to non-specialists. This role is for experienced practitioners who have evaluated real exposures and process risks in professional settings.
Posted September 14, 2026
You will contribute to evaluating frontier AI models as a nuclear fuel cycle expert. Your role will consist of writing nuanced technical questions and judging whether the model's answers comply with a safety policy, distinguishing between legitimate requests and potentially dangerous queries. This work requires a deep understanding of the parameters that differentiate a civilian application from a diversion for proliferation purposes.
Posted September 14, 2026
This job involves evaluating the capacity of AI models to distinguish legitimate requests from malicious uses in the field of nuclear medicine and medical isotopes. You will write nuanced test prompts and judge whether the model's responses comply with a security policy, while explaining your decisions in writing. This role requires specialized expertise to draw the line between routine professional questions and those concealing dangerous intentions.
Posted September 14, 2026
You will participate in evaluating cutting-edge AI models as a nuclear security specialist. You will write calibrated test prompts across three risk levels to judge whether the model correctly distinguishes legitimate professional questions from dangerous requests, then you will evaluate and document its responses according to a defined policy standard.
Posted September 14, 2026
Join a team of radiation safety experts to test the robustness of AI models against requests related to dual-use applications. You will write nuanced evaluation questions, assess model responses against strict safety criteria, and document your technical judgment to distinguish legitimate requests from dangerous ones.
Posted September 14, 2026
Mercor is looking for nuclear and safeguards experts to test the robustness of AI models against dual-use requests. You will write targeted prompts on the knife's edge between legitimate professional questions and dangerous requests, then evaluate the model's responses against a defined policy and write reference answers. This role is for practitioners with concrete experience in nuclear material verification and detecting diversion attempts.
Posted September 14, 2026
You will contribute to evaluating frontier AI models as a source security specialist. Your role is to write prompts that test the model's ability to distinguish legitimate professional questions from potentially dangerous requests, then evaluate its responses against a defined policy standard. This work requires practical expertise in Category 1 and 2 radioactive source security, as well as strong technical writing skills to justify your assessments.
Posted September 14, 2026
You will contribute to evaluating AI models as a specialist chemist in energetic materials, by writing technical requests that test the model's ability to distinguish legitimate questions from dangerous requests. You will need to master the fine line between civilian applications and misuse to design realistic scenarios and evaluate the model's responses.
Posted September 14, 2026
This role involves evaluating an AI model's responses to requests involving energetic materials and explosives, distinguishing between legitimate questions and dangerous requests. You will write progressively more complex test prompts, assess the model's responses against a defined safety policy, and provide written justification for your technical judgments. This role is intended for experts in materials chemistry specializing in propulsion and initiation systems, with solid practical experience in the field.
Posted September 9, 2026
Mercor is recruiting radiological safety experts to test the robustness of AI models against dual-use requests. You will write progressively complex prompts, evaluate model responses according to a defined policy, and document reference responses with technical justifications. This role requires deep expertise capable of distinguishing legitimate professional questions from potentially dangerous requests.
Posted September 9, 2026
Add your resume once. Every open job is scored against your profile, and we email you only when a strong match appears. Free.
FAQ
66 Vulnerability Assessment AI training jobs are open on SideHustler today. Listings are rechecked against the official postings: the latest check on this list was on October 8, 2026.
Among the 66 open roles that publish an hourly rate in USD, pay runs from $15 to $250 per hour, with a median of $63. These are the rates the platforms publish, not a guarantee of income or hours.
Mercor (42), Alignerr (19), DataAnnotation (3) and micro1 (2). You apply on the platform itself, which handles screening, contracts and payment.
The most requested areas of expertise on these listings are Vulnerability Assessment, AI Evaluation, Red Teaming, Adversarial Testing, AI Safety. Each listing states its own requirements.
Apply now opens the official posting on the platform, where you complete the application. You need no account on SideHustler. To see which roles fit your background first, add your resume and every open job is scored against your profile.
