$70/hrAs published by the platform.
This project asks licensed US pharmacists to answer medication-related clinical questions and to review AI-generated responses for accuracy, safety, clarity and completeness. It suits pharmacists who want to help make AI-supported prior authorisation workflows safer and more reliable. Reviewers also flag ambiguous or safety-critical cases for escalation.
$70/hr
Pay as published by the platform. It is not a guarantee of income or hours.
Open to residents of: United States.
You apply on work.mercor.com: create a profile, complete a skills assessment, then get matched to projects that fit your background.
Official posting: https://work.mercor.com/jobs/list_AAABoXuE96XzQVNYx-VDPpQa/licensed-us-pharmacist
Last checked on October 28, 2026.
This project asks pharmacy technicians to check medication-related clinical content and judge AI-generated answers for accuracy, safety, clarity and completeness, supporting AI-powered prior authorisation workflows. It is aimed at technicians with solid medication management and pharmacy operations experience who want to work on healthcare AI.
Posted October 27, 2026
This remote, asynchronous study asks practicing pharmacists to review de-identified clinical cases and pharmaceutical product images, then write expert evaluations and help build scoring rubrics. The results are meant to benchmark medical AI tools that interpret drug data and patient cases. It suits pharmacists from retail, clinical, or specialized hospital settings who can explain clinical reasoning clearly.
Posted October 23, 2026
This remote, hourly contract asks you to review and grade AI-generated content about healthcare data, electronic health record systems, and clinical workflows. The work helps AI labs make their models more accurate on medical information. It suits health informatics professionals who can judge clinical and technical accuracy and explain their feedback in writing.
This remote contract role asks medical science professionals to review and validate AI-generated biomedical content for accuracy, clarity, and context. It suits people with a background in medical affairs, clinical research, or scientific communication who want to shape how AI handles medical information.
This role involves evaluating how AI models handle nursing judgment in clinical scenarios such as patient assessment, medication safety, and triage protocols. Nurses will identify unsafe reasoning, incorrect clinical priorities, and protocol violations, then provide corrections grounded in real bedside practice.
This role asks radiologists and imaging technologists to read de-identified scans and judge how accurately frontier AI models interpret them. Contributors write structured reports and impressions, then compare them with model output to find errors and gaps. It suits clinicians with hands-on imaging experience who can explain why a machine-generated report is wrong.
