$40-125/hrAs published by the platform.
This role involves evaluating how AI models handle nursing judgment in clinical scenarios such as patient assessment, medication safety, and triage protocols. Nurses will identify unsafe reasoning, incorrect clinical priorities, and protocol violations, then provide corrections grounded in real bedside practice.
$40-125/hr
Pay as published by the platform. It is not a guarantee of income or hours.
The platform has not published which countries are eligible for this job.
You apply on DataAnnotation: create an account, take the qualification assessment for your field, then pick up paid projects when you qualify.
Official posting: https://www.dataannotation.tech/job-board/nurse
Last checked on October 8, 2026.
This remote contract role asks oncology clinical research experts to review AI-generated cancer content for scientific accuracy, clinical validity, and regulatory alignment. The work covers trial protocols, safety and efficacy data, biomarker findings, and FDA or EMA-style reporting. It is aimed at professionals with hands-on experience designing and analyzing oncology trials who want to work asynchronously on their own schedule.
This role involves evaluating AI models' clinical reasoning on nursing topics including assessment, medication administration, and patient care protocols. Registered nurses will identify gaps between textbook knowledge and real bedside practice, write test prompts to probe nursing judgment, and provide corrected guidance when AI outputs contain unsafe or incorrect clinical information.
This job involves writing and reviewing high-quality assessment questions in medicine and health sciences for an AI research project. Selected candidates will create original and rigorous multiple-choice questions, evaluate their quality, and contribute to establishing benchmark standards used to develop AI system capabilities.
Posted August 13, 2026
This remote, hourly contract asks you to review and grade AI-generated content about healthcare data, electronic health record systems, and clinical workflows. The work helps AI labs make their models more accurate on medical information. It suits health informatics professionals who can judge clinical and technical accuracy and explain their feedback in writing.
This role involves evaluating how well AI models reason through cardiology cases, identifying errors in clinical judgment that could harm patients. Cardiologists will write prompts to test AI reasoning, review AI outputs for accuracy against current guidelines, and provide correct answers when the model errs, serving as the training signal for AI improvement.
This role asks practicing physicians to judge how well health AI models handle diagnoses, clinical reasoning and care plans. The work is part-time and asynchronous, aimed at MDs and DOs who currently see patients in primary care, internal medicine or hospital-based specialties.
Posted October 8, 2026
