$40-80/hrAs published by the platform.
This remote contract role asks oncology clinical research experts to review AI-generated cancer content for scientific accuracy, clinical validity, and regulatory alignment. The work covers trial protocols, safety and efficacy data, biomarker findings, and FDA or EMA-style reporting. It is aimed at professionals with hands-on experience designing and analyzing oncology trials who want to work asynchronously on their own schedule.
$40-80/hr
Pay as published by the platform. It is not a guarantee of income or hours.
The platform has not published which countries are eligible for this job.
You apply on Alignerr, Labelbox's expert network: create a profile, complete an AI-led interview and skills assessment, then get matched to projects in your field.
Official posting: https://www.alignerr.com/jobs/00536f41-76cc-4b51-9e56-f83a50ca23e5
Last checked on October 8, 2026.
This job involves writing and reviewing high-quality assessment questions in medicine and health sciences for an AI research project. Selected candidates will create original and rigorous multiple-choice questions, evaluate their quality, and contribute to establishing benchmark standards used to develop AI system capabilities.
Posted August 13, 2026
This remote contract role asks public health graduates to bring their domain knowledge to AI training. The work involves building realistic population health scenarios, writing evidence-based reference answers, and reviewing AI-generated health advice for accuracy, logic, bias, and ethics. It suits independent, self-directed specialists who can explain health data clearly, and no prior AI experience is required.
This remote contract role asks medical science professionals to review and validate AI-generated biomedical content for accuracy, clarity, and context. It suits people with a background in medical affairs, clinical research, or scientific communication who want to shape how AI handles medical information.
This role involves evaluating how AI models handle nursing judgment in clinical scenarios such as patient assessment, medication safety, and triage protocols. Nurses will identify unsafe reasoning, incorrect clinical priorities, and protocol violations, then provide corrections grounded in real bedside practice.
This role involves evaluating AI models' clinical reasoning on nursing topics including assessment, medication administration, and patient care protocols. Registered nurses will identify gaps between textbook knowledge and real bedside practice, write test prompts to probe nursing judgment, and provide corrected guidance when AI outputs contain unsafe or incorrect clinical information.
This short-term remote project asks practicing oncologists to test how frontier AI models reason through real-world cases, with a focus on clinical trial design, patient eligibility and treatment decisions. Contributors write challenging scenarios, judge model answers against current standard-of-care guidelines, and flag errors or unsafe advice. It suits clinicians with fellowship training and hands-on clinical trial experience who want to apply their expertise to AI research.
Posted October 8, 2026
