$350/hrAs published by the platform.
This remote, hourly role asks board-certified cardiologists to review how AI systems answer cardiology questions. Reviewers compare each answer against a de-identified patient chart and judge its clinical accuracy, safety and fit with current standards of care. It is designed for practicing US physicians who want flexible part-time work applying their clinical judgment to health AI.
$350/hr
Pay as published by the platform. It is not a guarantee of income or hours.
Open to residents of: United States.
You apply on work.mercor.com: create a profile, complete a skills assessment, then get matched to projects that fit your background.
Official posting: https://work.mercor.com/jobs/list_AAABoWtwvCp5G7Swt0JDu7wl/cardiologist
Last checked on October 31, 2026.
This remote, hourly contract asks you to review and grade AI-generated content about healthcare data, electronic health record systems, and clinical workflows. The work helps AI labs make their models more accurate on medical information. It suits health informatics professionals who can judge clinical and technical accuracy and explain their feedback in writing.
This remote contract role asks public health graduates to bring their domain knowledge to AI training. The work involves building realistic population health scenarios, writing evidence-based reference answers, and reviewing AI-generated health advice for accuracy, logic, bias, and ethics. It suits independent, self-directed specialists who can explain health data clearly, and no prior AI experience is required.
This role involves evaluating AI-generated responses to health and medical questions for clinical accuracy and safety. The expert identifies errors in reasoning, missed contraindications, unsafe advice, and writes correct answers grounded in current clinical practice, ensuring AI models provide guidance that real clinicians would trust.
This role involves evaluating how AI models handle nursing judgment in clinical scenarios such as patient assessment, medication safety, and triage protocols. Nurses will identify unsafe reasoning, incorrect clinical priorities, and protocol violations, then provide corrections grounded in real bedside practice.
This remote project asks healthcare practitioners to test AI assistants on realistic clinical tasks. Contributors play the role of a real user, guide the assistant over several conversational turns, and judge its output against a professional standard. It suits clinicians who already use AI tools in their day-to-day work.
Posted October 30, 2026
This remote, part-time role asks breast imaging radiologists to read de-identified studies and write reference findings that will set the standard for testing AI systems. Contributors also review AI-drafted reports and flag content that is inaccurate, unsupported or unsafe. It is intended for fellowship-trained specialists with substantial independent practice.
Posted October 28, 2026
