$60-100/hrAs published by the platform.
This contract role asks a forensic firearms specialist to check how well AI systems answer casework-style questions about firearm and toolmark examination. The work involves judging whether model answers on microscopic comparison, firing pin and breech face impressions, and rifling are accurate and follow laboratory practice, then writing up feedback. It suits examiners who know forensic ballistics well, and no prior AI experience is needed.
$60-100/hr
Pay as published by the platform. It is not a guarantee of income or hours.
Open to residents of: Bangladesh, Hong Kong SAR China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Malaysia, Pakistan, Philippines, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand, Uzbekistan, Vietnam, Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Netherlands, Portugal, Russia, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom, Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Peru, Algeria, Bahrain, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, Oman, Palestinian Territories, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates, United States, Canada, Nigeria, Kenya, South Africa, Ghana, Ethiopia.
You apply on micro1: create an account, complete a screening interview with its AI interviewer, then join its vetted expert network to be matched to projects.
Official posting: https://jobs.micro1.ai/post/f000899c-4d4b-4e53-b7be-66ee789ec5ce
Last checked on October 30, 2026.
You will write and evaluate requests designed to test the ability of AI models to distinguish legitimate technical questions from dangerous requests in the field of energetic materials. This role requires deep expertise in post-incident analysis and regulatory inspection to draw the line between routine professional uses and potential misuse.
Posted September 14, 2026
You will contribute to the evaluation of frontier AI models as an expert in nuclear materials and non-proliferation measures. Your job is to write sophisticated test questions in your field and evaluate whether models correctly refuse dangerous requests while answering legitimate questions, drawing a subtle line between civil and military applications.
Posted September 14, 2026
This role involves translating mathematical proofs into machine-verifiable Lean 4 formalizations for an AI research organization. Mathematicians with formal proof system experience will work on bridging informal mathematical arguments and automated reasoning, identifying gaps in current verification tools and helping advance mechanized mathematics at the intersection of AI and rigorous proof.
This role invites PhD-level applied physicists to evaluate and improve how AI models reason about physical systems. You will design advanced physics problems, author rigorous solutions, audit AI-generated reasoning for physical consistency, and provide expert feedback to refine model behavior across classical mechanics, electrodynamics, quantum mechanics, and related domains.
This role involves evaluating AI-generated chemical reasoning and responses to identify flawed mechanisms, unsafe procedures, and analytical errors. You will write prompts to test chemical knowledge, review AI outputs for errors, and provide correct expert-level answers with proper attention to safety and experimental conditions.
A drug discovery scientist will design realistic preclinical tasks and evaluate how well frontier AI models perform them, grading responses against professional standards. The role involves creating scenarios based on real workflows, running them through AI systems, and providing detailed feedback on whether the models correctly conduct SAR analysis, DMPK interpretation, screening triage, and other core discovery work.
